does NOT (unfortunately). I don’t! And I’m smarter than + can whip words and debate, go toe to toe with anybody and make my points better than her.
I’m certain to make you think twice about debating or coming for me (half-cocked or sideways) without knowing what/who you’re dealing with and your ducks not in a row. That said, still, not even I would step into that ring-today! God forbid someone asked her to elaborate [on] her knowledge of Pearl Harbor-which she claimed to be so nostalgic and concerned about the President not being mindful about. I’m positive she couldn’t have (segued into articulate commentary on live television) the history of Pearl Harbor and tied the day’s anniversary being something president Obama could have interjected and been mindful about during his address to the nation on terrorism. In all modesty and seriousness-I couldn’t either. But I’m not in politics-she is (at least, aspires to be).
Her ducks are not enough in row such to be respected as the equal to the party by which she insists on identifying. While she has every right to side with whichever side she wishes, in her case, it’s better to do and feel it in private (or on Twitter at best).
The problem with stepping outside from behind your respective 140-character world is that, sensation rules the world now.
Whether it be politics or entertainment, no one cares to care for your “well being” and how you make yourSELF look in the end/when all is said and done and/“at the end of the day” (however you wish to put it).
Whereas before the playing fields of media buttons being overseen and held by only television and radio media, the playing fields have opened such that those powers that be (and not were) have to bow down to sensation—and play ITS game, too. And often times, YOU’RE the “game”–being hunted, and played for “play.”
