answer because like his wife, I take wanting to be an official in command of an entire country: Serious-people’s lives are affected. So to delegate oneself, or proclaim to someday be or run for a countries chief commanding officer, it has to be well over the fact that yet, another record could be broken (or well over presumptuousness and the test of ones popularity, association, and/or success crossing political boundaries).
J
ada Pinkett-Smith; this wife [of Will Smith] who refers to herself as a “womanist” (over being feminist)—although sees Hilary Clinton running for the presidency as (possibly) a good thing. And like me (when her very own husband was simply proclaiming “I could be president”) has some questions.
Her questions however, are centered around the divide of gender v. race as, in the Americas by which we live (and sing land of the free-home of the brave, with liberty and justice for all) the fact of the matter is this:
Although women (white, black or all races) share the same level at the totem pole under men, (no matter how “equal” time keeps saying we’ve progressed to be), the second issue within that issue is race.
That being the case, the dichotomy goes something like this:
If women are at the bottom of the totem pole by contrast to men, and people of color are at the bottom of the totem pole (by contrast to other races) where does that leave the woman of color in the political scheme of things?—with issues that are exclusive to women of color?
Although Hilary is a woman, she is not a woman of color. That being the case, people like Jada Pinkett-Smith question [and are curious about] Hilary’s plight and stance on political/social class issues that are exclusive to, and directly effect women of
